Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen started defaming Mona Chu “no one liked her; no one wanted her; etc.” the first month on the job in the Training Academy. Ms. Chu had never met Tuan Nguyen or his countrymen in her life. Ms. Chu had just moved to the DC metro for the job and only know one person here. During this time, Ms. Chu spent most of her time in her cube.
As time progresses, defamation such as Paul Rodriguez, the SPE Trainer played favoritism toward women, and only liked to talk and help women; or that good looking woman had it easy because guys like to help them, etc., beginning to promulgate the class; in reference to Ms. Chu talked to Mr. Rodriguez about patent cases; to which Ms. Chu had to keep a distance such not to create resentment toward either one of them. If Ms. Chu didn’t stop talking to Mr. Rodriguez, the next slander would be to accuse Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Chu of having an affair. Ms. Chu knew this because similar accusations had been made toward Ms. Chu when Ms. Chu worked in the Silicon Valley as she was often the only female in the whole engineering Dept, by people-from-Asia; just like America in the Dark Age when witch-hunt was practiced. You cannot possibly imagine the kinds of sexual harassments and abuses Ms. Chu had to endure working in the Silicon Valley being the only woman working with 90+% of people from Asia where women are a second class citizen.
Typical slanders to incite resentment and abuses toward Ms. Chu is: "she is too smart, she is going to take your job away". If you are Chinese, Vietnamese, Indian or any nationality, they would say "Ms. Chu doesn't like Chinese/Vietnamese/Indian/any nationality". If you are an American, "Ms. Chu is a racist". If you hated Japanese, Korean, etc., they would say "Ms. Chu is Japanese, Korean, etc." If you hated American , "she thinks she is an American". To incite sexual harassment termination and rape, "she needs a man; she likes to check men out; etc."; to re-enforce such notion to ensure Ms. Chu will be terminated and rape, Hung Havan and Michele Choi used their smartphones to set Ms. Chu up such she would come across as if she was checking him out . Basically, people Ms. Chu had never met in her life such as Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen would do and say insidious things to incite hatred, sexual harassment, abuse, termination, physical harm and rape toward Ms. Chu.
This reminds you of how educated women are treated in the Third World, doesn't it? A la Malala Yousufzai, gang rape of a woman medical student in Delhi, etc. That's why Ms. Chu carried a pepper spray with her. A classmate from that parts of the world said it best, "women smarter than them is the equivalent of slapping them on the face." One must understand what it means to be slap on the face in other parts of the world.
The likes of Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen set a bad precedent of defaming Ms. Chu that incited and followed by other classmates such as Randy Shaffer. No one noticed Ms.Chu prior to Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen's defamations. Classmate Shawn Joseph spread to other Training classes in the Training Academy, the Training classes spread to their Art Unit and the rest of the patent office, where they spread to their friends, family, neighbors and neighborhoods like Arlington Va. As the result, Ms. Chu can't get a job while being sexually harassed, abused, under the threat of physical harms and rape that resulted in the slit throat of Ms. Chu that was meant to kill her, and will be homeless soon; while large number of Tuan Nguyen's countrymen have been hired and promoted in the Patent and Trademark Office. Women are such an easy target to be ruined and fired.
Shawn Joseph had shunned Ms. Chu from participating in group discussions in the Training class.
Jessica Jung-Mu T Chuang had asked Tuan Nguyen why did Tuan Nguyen slandered Ms. Chu.
Through out Ms. Chu's life, people with issues (racism, bigotry, psychologically unstable, avaricious, envious, jealousy, pernicious, evil, etc.) hated her as soon as they see her, even though they had never met Ms. Chu in their life; and good people liked her as soon as they see her. Ms. Chu is like the mirror in the fairy tale Snow White, they show their true self to Ms. Chu.
Paul Rodriguez set Mona Chu up to be terminated from the get-go since the Training Academy Dec, 2010 as Ms. Chu is Chinese and female, evidenced by deliberately gave Ms. Chu a low performance review on her 4th month evaluation when Ms. Chu already had an airtight first case known to many Supervisors and Mr. David Kappos - ex-Under Secretory of the Patent and Trademake office. When Ms. Chu shown she could do the 3 COPA cases per biweek in June, 2011, Mr. Rodriguez hastens Ms. Chu’s termination before her 1 year probationary period end on Nov, 9, 2011, by making every effort to make her job difficult from confined to use only Agency’s EAST search tool to not allowed helps from Simon Ke, and put difficult COPA cases on Ms. Chu’s docket. When that didn’t work as Ms. Chu was able to meet the 3 cases per biweek. In July, 2011, Mr. Rodriguez asked Ms. Chu to re-do a case that’s already accepted for credit and refused to accept anything from Ms. Chu to justify Ms. Chu's termination as indicated in their July 27-28 email (chu production 1.pdf page 555-556) when they already decided to terminate Ms. Chu. Ms. Chu was hired into AU2128 in Nov. 2010, and transferred to AU2123 in ~April of 2011.
Director Ms. Wendy Garber, Zachary Clifton and other management agreed to terminate Mona Chu partially due to the defamation of Mona Chu by Dwin Craig, Hung Havan (Ms. Chu’s officemate) and his cabal - Nathan Hillery (a Union Rep), Michele Choi, Susanne Lo and her AU2128 Indian friends; in addition to Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen as the result of discrimination toward Ms. Chu as stated in the Formal Complaint in no less than 20 pages. All these defamations resulted in sexual harassment and a hostile working environment for Ms. Chu which she had to take frequent sick leaves in late June and July of 2011 that resulted in productivity drop from 103% to 50% or less.
Defamation by Hung Havan such as Ms. Chu and Susanne Lo’s boyfriend Bill (in charge of COPA event) will be married soon (against Agency policy), whom Ms. Chu has only spoken to a few times as she worked nearly 24/7 and didn’t even know his last name. It is well known Bill and Susanne Lo been dating for a long time, we saw them going home together all the time. I also told Hung Havan and a few others I have a boyfriend in NYC soon after I moved into the office. Additionally, Hung Havan and Michele Choi used their smartphones to set Ms. Chu up such she would come across as if she was checking him out to incite sexual harassment, abuse, termination and rape. Furthermore, Hung Havan defamed Ms. Chu says she is just like Michele Choi who is hated everywhere, especially by Dwin Craig; which Mr. Craig then told Ms. Garber and other management; and Mr. Rodriguez very much willing to use this to terminate Ms. Chu. Hung Havan aware that Mr. Rodriguez was setting Ms. Chu up to be terminated as Ms. Chu told Hung Havan during the 6th month evaluation in hopes of finding remedies.
Ms. Chu received her termination news on Aug. 10, 2011. On Aug. 11, 2011, a day before Ms. Chu's last day, hours after she received her termination letter; Ms. Chu walked into her office and saw Nathan Hillery sitting there looking dismal. Ms. Chu requested Union helps from Nathan Hillery from termination and help to transfer to another TC/AU. Nathan Hillery gave Hung Havan a look to see what is going on. Hung Havan had a smile on his face. Soon after Ms. Chu disclosed the Art Unit, Nathan Hillery asked Ms. Chu who the Director was. Ms. Chu said she didn’t know. Hung Havan searched the computer, and both left the office right away in a conspicuous way without helping Ms. Chu, while Nathan Hillery suddenly became alive and happy as if he got his life back. On their way out, Nathan Hillery said in a whisper to Hung Havan, “she didn't know I got her fired?”. Hung Havan gave him a smirk. Hours later, this SPE from the new Art Unit called Ms. Chu and said he couldn’t help Ms. Chu because he received a call from HR of some sort and warned him not to get involved, he can’t afford to lose this job.
Nathan Hillery abused his Union Representative position by using his position to terminate Ms. Chu through defamation of Ms. Chu everywhere and access to management. Ms. Chu suspected he is one of the few that pushed this termination agenda with the USPTO management, using his Union Rep. position. Ms. Chu had also requested helps from other TC2100 Union Representatives to no avail.
Nathan
Hillery deliberately elbowed me on his way home in May/June 2011. Someone
may had saw Nathan Hillery elbowed my
breast/chest and reported him to
authority, that's why he set me up for termination as retaliation
thinking that I was the one reported him. This was why I didn't
report for fear of retaliation as I was a probationary employee that
can be fired for anything. Also why these people elbowed
me, sexually harassed, abused and defamed me without reservation
as they knew probationary employed are afraid to say
anything.
Days before Ms. Chu's termination, she ran into Nathan Hillery, Susanne Lo and her AU2128 Indian friends in the pantry, on their way out, Nathan Hillery said to them “she is his kryptonite”. Also, Susanne Lo suddenly said good-bye to Ms. Chu with a smirk during one of AU2128's meeting where Ms. Chu talked to Kamini Shah, 2 days before Ms. Chu's termination notification on 8/10/2011. Ms. Chu had an ominous feeling. Susanne Lo had been cold and ignoring Ms. Chu whenever Ms. Chu greeted her.
“So my Union Rep. is a Teflon shield, they can’t touch me or fired me as long I am a Union Rep?” Nathan Hillery said this at least twice to Hung Havan in Mr. Havan and Ms. Chu's office at different time, he knew nothing can be done to him no matter what he did as long he is a Union Rep, included set Ms. Chu up to be terminated. Ms. Chu is so disgusted with Union.
Nathan Hillery had elbowed Ms. Chu on the chest outside of her office on his way home one night. Michele Choi had elbowed Ms. Chu on the chest to push Ms. Chu out of her way after she looted Ms. Chu's office supply on Ms. Chu's last day. Hung Havan used force to stop Ms. Chu from saying goodbye to Erica, a Chinese-American woman down the hall from Ms. Chu's office. On Ms. Chu last day, when she went to say goodbye to Erica, Hung Havan was talking to Erica outside of her doorway. Hung Havan looked happy. Ms. Chu attempted to walk inside to Erica's office, Hung suddenly stretched his arm out such Ms. Chu's chest/breast hit his arm. Ms. Chu had to push his arm out of her way. Erica asked him why he did this, he smirked and shrugs his shoulder as if to say "she is fired, what is she going to do?" Then Hung Havan stood in the middle of the hallway to block Ms. Chu from going to say goodbye to other coworkers, which left only one way of the hallway for Ms. Chu to go, and that is back to her office. Ms. Chu went back to her office, packed up and left the Agency for good.
Before terminating Ms. Chu, Ms. Wendy Garber, Zachary Clifton and management interviewed Hung Havan regarding Ms. Chu where he defamed Ms. Chu that finalized the termination decision; hence the “argumentative” in Ms. Garber’s affidavits over and over again (ROI page 000136 – 000140) even though Ms. Chu has only spoken to Ms. Garber once on June 2, 2011. Also gave Mr. Rodriguez a reason to terminate Ms. Chu even though they communicated via email and Office Action only, and Ms. Chu has only seen Mr. Rodriguez less than 5 times after Ms. Chu joined AU2123 for fear of defamation of favoritism and having an affair, while worked nearly 24/7 as evidenced by her computer log time and accomplishments.
Basically, Hung Havan is so conning, he makes Bernie Madoff looks like honest Abe. He is so slick, he makes Bill Clinton looks like a school boy.
Hung Havan, Nathan Hillery, Michele Choi and Susanne Lo are known to be “argumentative” and did not had any of the accomplishments Ms. Chu had in their probationary period, yet they are NOT terminated. Hung Havan been at the verge of termination since Ms. Chu first met him, his friend Bill (Susanne Lo 's boyfriend) and Nathan Hillery been helping him and Michele Choi from termination. They all referred to Bill as their frienemy. Hung Havan and his cabal often congregated in Susanne Lo's AU2128 (Indian) friends' office in RND 5th floor near Dwin Craig's office and the pantry. Ms. Chu often see Mr. Craig stood outside of their office when they gathered, which means Mr. Craig had heard defamations of Ms. Chu by Hung Havan and his cabal. Hung Havan, Nathan Hillery and their cabal intended to move into management by manipulating and eliminating competitions as well managements that got in their way. Hung Havan learned Ms. Chu was doing 3 cases per biweek via PALM in June 2011.
Basically, Hung Havan is so conning, he makes Bernie Madoff looks like honest Abe. He is so slick, he makes Bill Clinton looks like a school boy.
Hung Havan, Nathan Hillery, Michele Choi and Susanne Lo are known to be “argumentative” and did not had any of the accomplishments Ms. Chu had in their probationary period, yet they are NOT terminated. Hung Havan been at the verge of termination since Ms. Chu first met him, his friend Bill (Susanne Lo 's boyfriend) and Nathan Hillery been helping him and Michele Choi from termination. They all referred to Bill as their frienemy. Hung Havan and his cabal often congregated in Susanne Lo's AU2128 (Indian) friends' office in RND 5th floor near Dwin Craig's office and the pantry. Ms. Chu often see Mr. Craig stood outside of their office when they gathered, which means Mr. Craig had heard defamations of Ms. Chu by Hung Havan and his cabal. Hung Havan, Nathan Hillery and their cabal intended to move into management by manipulating and eliminating competitions as well managements that got in their way. Hung Havan learned Ms. Chu was doing 3 cases per biweek via PALM in June 2011.
Sister Unit AU2128 was predominately Asians and women during the time (March, 2011) when Mona Chu was there, many were originally transferred from AU2123; while AU2123 had only one woman Mary Jacob and one Asian male who was an Engineering Professor when Ms. Chu was there. One to two women transferred out of AU2123 when Ms. Chu transferred into AU2123. Then a new hired woman Sheela Rao when Ms. Chu was in AU2123, she’s also transferred out of AU2123 by Paul Rodriguez in 2012. A supervisor QZ Wang of AU2629 wanted Ms. Chu to transfer into his Unit before her termination, yet Mr. Rodriguez talked him out of transferring Ms. Chu into his Unit (chu production 1.pdf page 621). Howard Locker, a Union VP also tried to make Ms. Chu’s case to Ms. Garber and asked for an extension until Ms. Chu’s 1 year probationary period (chu production 1.pdf page 636) to no avail.
Mona Chu met every stringent requirements, “The first pay period you fail to meet this requirement will likely be your last pay period.” that stated by Ms. Garber in her affidavit for the June, 2nd, 2011 of the 6th month evaluation meeting with Mr. Rodriguez, which Ms. Chu did meet 3 cases-per-bi-week on the first pay period -June7 and again the following pay period June 22, according to Mr. Rodriguez’s Affidavit. Mr. Rodriguez already putted COPA cases in Ms. Chu's docket soon after the meeting. There is no production requirement for probationary employees as stated in both Paul Rodriguez and Ms. Garber's affidavits. Ms. Chu had to work nearly 24/7 to meet the 2 consecutive 3 COPA cases-per-bi-week right after the 6th month evaluation, 93% Productivity and a total of 19 cases including COPA cases soon after the 8th month evaluation. Ms. Chu also had an airtight first case that is known to many SPE and Mr. David Kappo – Director of the Agency/Patent and Trademark Office. In addition to Ms. Chu's qualifications: a Master’s degree in Electrical Engineering(ROI page 000025), was pursuing a PhD while at the same time pursuing a second Master’s in Computer Science, as an adjunct in college, did research in Applied Physics and published paper (ROI page 000028, http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-32-21-3944). Ms. Chu aspired to be a scientist/Professor/researcher in college, to change the world and make the world a better place to live. Most Ms. Chu's co-workers would've been Ms. Chu's student had Ms. Chu's research funding wasn't cut.
Furthermore, Ms. Chu has extensive industry experiences and outstanding accomplishments in the same field as the patent class 703 – Simulation, Emulation and Modeling (see my resume (chu production 1.pdf page 29-30)) http://www.deepchip.com/items/0343-06.html where Ms. Chu led projects. Ms. Chu had a history of outstanding accomplishments in a male dominated Engineering field and academia which Ms. Chu had to work nearly 24/7 to achieve such result. Yet, Mona Chu is terminated as the resulted of discriminations toward her as a Chinese and female when Mr. Rodrigues realized Ms. Chu was perfectly capable of doing 3 COPA cases per biweek without any help and under extreme condition put on by Mr. Rodrigues and Ms. Garber.
The fact that key people such as Wendy Gerber, Paul Rodrigues, Zachery Clifton etc. that Mona Chu named in her Formal Complaint were either demoted or fired speaks volume. But the key culprits Hung Havan, Nathan Hillery, Michele Choi, Susanne Lo and her (Indian) friends, Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen are still employed while not only put management themselves in harms ways, but everyone in the Patent and Trademarks Office as well, particularly now they are the suspects for the slit of my throat.
It is indicative of how a few pernicious individuals had such control over a large U.S. Government institution and surroundings of the U.S. Capital. They have shown capable of doing harms to management by indirectly influenced their demotion and termination, and more lawsuits will come. Which management will they target next?
Without Hung Havan, Nathan Hillery, Michele Choi, Susanne Lo and her (Indian) friends, it would take at least a year for Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen to incite enough people to get Ms. Chu fired as Ms. Chu stayed low key and not be seen such to ensure no one aware of her existence. However, Paul Rodriguez would fired Ms. Chu on the last day of the her probationary period.
The USPTO has been known as the pinnacle of intellectual, yet the place is akin to a sweatshop of FoxConn, why?
